PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

AQUA METALS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

AQUA METALS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

AQUA METALS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

AQUA METALS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on March 11, 2020, or our Annual Report.

In this report we make, and from time to time we otherwise make written and oral statements regarding our business and prospects, such as projections of future performance, statements of management’s plans and objectives, forecasts of market trends, and other matters that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements containing the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “target,” “goal,” “plans,” “objective,” “should” or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which may appear in our documents, reports, filings with the SEC, and news releases, and in written or oral presentations made by officers or other representatives to analysts, stockholders, investors, news organizations and others, and in discussions with management and other of our representatives.

Our future results, including results related to forward-looking statements, involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks included below in Part II, Item 1 “Risk Factors”. No assurance can be given that the results reflected in any forward-looking statements will be achieved. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. Our forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions that are sometimes based upon estimates, data, communications and other information from suppliers, government agencies and other sources that may be subject to revision. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or keep current either (i) any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of such statement or (ii) the important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results or trends, results anticipated or planned by us, or which are reflected from time to time in any forward-looking statement.

General

Aqua Metals (NASDAQ: AQMS) is engaged in the business of equipment supply, technology licensing and related services for recycling lead through a novel, proprietary and patented process we developed and named AquaRefining^™. AquaRefining is a room temperature, water and organic acid-based process that greatly reduces environmental emissions. Lead is a globally traded commodity with a worldwide market value in excess of $20 billion. We believe our suite of patented and patent pending AquaRefining technologies will allow the lead-acid battery industry to simultaneously improve the environmental impact of lead recycling and scale recycling production to meet demand. Furthermore, our AquaRefining technologies result in high purity lead. We were formed as a Delaware corporation on June 20, 2014 and since our formation, we have focused our efforts on the development and testing of our AquaRefining process, the construction of our initial lead acid battery, or LAB, recycling facility at the Tahoe Reno Industrial Center, or TRIC, located in McCarran, Nevada and commercializing the AquaRefining process.

We completed the development of our LAB recycling facility at Nevada’s Tahoe Reno Industrial Center, or TRIC, in McCarran, Nevada and commenced production of battery breaking and limited operations during the first quarter of 2017. In April 2017, we commenced the shipment of products for sale, consisting of lead compounds as well as plastics. In April 2018, we commenced the limited production of lead bullion, including AquaRefined lead. In July 2018, we commenced the sale of pure AquaRefined lead in the form of two tonne blocks and in October 2018, we commenced the sale of AquaRefined lead in the form of battery manufacturing ready ingots. In November 2018, we received official vendor certification from Clarios for our AquaRefined lead and in December 2018, we commenced shipments directly to Clarios owned and partner battery manufacturing facilities. In 2019, we operated our demonstration AquaRefinery at commercial quantity production levels and produced over 35,000 AquaRefined ingots by operating the AquaRefinery 24 hours a day and 7 days a week for sustained periods of time. The AquaRefining electrolyzers produced at or above the target 100 Kg/Hr of production throughput per module of six electrolyzers or ~16-17 Kg/Hr per electrolyzer and ran sustained endurance runs for over one month several times.

In order to expand the demonstration AquaRefinery to its full capacity, we chose to idle the AquaRefinery beginning in September 2019 to facilitate contracting work required to increase the plant capacity planned for late 2019 or early 2020. On the evening of November 29, 2019, a fire occurred in the AquaRefining area of the recycling facility at TRIC. The cause of the fire was not due to the technology or process of AquaRefining but rather to contracting activities. The fire and related intense heat and smoke caused significant damage to a material amount of equipment in the AquaRefinery area, including all 16 AquaRefining modules, electrical and tank infrastructure, steel superstructure, control wiring and other supporting infrastructure. The floor to ceiling firewall between the AquaRefining area and the rest of the plant isolated the worst of the damage to the AquaRefining area. The firewall also appears to have spared material damage to much of the key front-end process equipment, such as the battery breaker/separation system, concentrate production area, kettles and ingot casting, water treatment and recovery and other important areas of the plant. The administrative office area also remained intact.

During the first half of 2020, we successfully performed test runs on the first and second iterations of our electrolyzer as part of our V1.25L program. The program consists of three iterations that are classified as V1.25a, V1.25b and the final iteration, V1.25L, the latter of which will be used to create the AquaRefining electrolyzer package for our equipment supply and licensing offerings. Our business model focus is on global licensing opportunities to incorporate AquaRefining in the recycling industry.

Based on estimates, as of the date of this report, we believe that the replacement value of the equipment and plant lost or damaged in the fire could be as much as $30 million excluding any business interruption cost recovery. Assets on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2020 that were not affected by the fire total approximately $37 million in book value, including the battery breaker, melting kettles, kiln, filter presses, mixing and storage tanks, water recovery system and the building infrastructure plus the land. We have $50 million dollars in combined property, equipment and business interruption insurance.

Pursuant to the loan agreement with Veritex Community Bank, or Veritex, the successor in interest to Green Bank, N.A., for approximately $9.1 million ($8.5 million net of issuance costs), Veritex is the loss payee on our insured claims and all funds are paid directly to Veritex, which in turn disburses the proceeds to us subject to their approval. In March 2020, we entered into a memorandum of agreement with Veritex pursuant to which the parties agreed on the allocation of funds from collected insurance payments. Pursuant to the memorandum of agreement, 90% of the initial $5 million and 55% of the next $7.5 million of insurance proceeds were allocated to us and the balance was allocated towards the retirement of the Veritex loan. Thereafter, 60% of the next $12.5 million of insurance proceeds have been and will be allocated to us, and the balance towards the repayment of the Veritex loan, until such time as the Veritex loan has been paid in full, after which 100% of all future insurance payouts will be disbursed directly to us.

As of September 30, 2020, of the $21.8 million of insurance proceeds received from our insurance carriers, Veritex has put into escrow $7.6 million and we have received $14.2 million. We expect the insurance carriers to pay additional amounts up to our current claims and complete total payments over the next three to six months. We intend to vigorously pursue receipt of insurance proceeds to satisfy in full all of our property, casualty and business interruption losses, subject to the coverage limits.

We have engaged a public adjuster to support our legal and finance team and provide forensic accounting, construction expertise and direct interface with the insurers to assist us in quickly and properly documenting the loss and maximizing our insurance recovery amounts on the best possible timeline.

As a result of the fire, we suspended all commercial operations. Following the fire, an investigation of the fire was commenced by the Storey County Fire Marshal and we were denied access to the fire damaged portion of the facility until late December 2019, at which time we were given access to the fire damaged area. Since then, we have been engaged in the process of analyzing the fire damage and the clean-up and disposal of the damaged equipment, and the implementation of our capital light strategy.  

Plan of Operations

Following the November 2019 fire, we have been engaged in the pursuit of a capital light strategy that is based on the pursuit of licensing opportunities within the lead battery recycling marketplace without maintaining and operating a capital-intensive lead recycling facility. We plan to continue securing our cash position by working on the successful collection of additional insurance proceeds with the assistance of our retained public adjuster and special counsel to facilitate the collection for property and business interruption losses. We intend to dispose of certain assets that are not essential to the capital light licensing strategy. We believe our capital light business strategy will require less space and less equipment and focus on the needs of our future licensees. As of the date of this report, we have accelerated our capital light business strategy, designed to optimize shareholder value by focusing on equipment supply and licensing opportunities, which have always been a core part of our business plans. We believe this path has the potential to maximize shareholder value in that it could be far less capital intensive than a plant rebuild and could be funded solely or primarily from a combination of cash on hand, insurance proceeds and asset dispositions.

Our capital light strategy is consistent with our long-held business strategy and objectives. When we designed and developed TRIC in 2016, we did so at a time when our business model assumed that TRIC would be the first of many LAB recycling facilities owned and operated by us. Commencing in 2017, we began to shift our focus away from the development of additional Company-owned LAB recycling facilities and towards the licensing of our AquaRefining technology to partners engaged in LAB recycling. We continued to develop TRIC as a LAB recycling facility for purposes of further demonstrating AquaRefining on a commercial scale. However, as a result of the fire and our high costs of capital we believe that the cost of restoring TRIC to its pre-fire state would not be the best use of our available and projected cash and that we may be able to achieve the benefits of operating our facility at TRIC in its pre-fire state, namely the development and demonstration of the licensing ready iteration of our AquaRefining technologies, which we call Version 1.25L, through a less costly commercialization program. Further, we believe that our results of operations to date can demonstrate to potential licensees the value proposition of our AquaRefining technologies. We believe that our AquaRefining technology would be a commercially attractive valuable proposition in the hands of battery recyclers, who typically have access to lower cost feedstock and ability to process all materials on site through a furnace.

Results of Operations

Our lead recycling facility was not in production during the third quarter of 2020 due to the fire and the acceleration of our licensing strategy. During the third quarter of 2020, our revenue resulted from the sale of inventory consisting of lead compounds that were generated during pre-fire operations. Product sales during the third quarter of 2019 consisted of high purity lead from our AquaRefining process as well as lead bullion, lead compounds, and plastics. The following table summarizes our results of operations with respect to the items set forth below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 together with the percentage change in those items (in thousands).

As mentioned previously, historical product sales have consisted of high-purity lead from our AquaRefining process as well as lead bullion, lead compounds and plastics. Except for nominal sales of inventory in the first and third quarters of 2020, we did not generate revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 as there has been no significant production subsequent to the fire that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2019. The plant will not be in production during 2020 except for the operation and testing of our improved electrolyzers as part of the V1.25 program.

Cost of product sales includes raw materials, supplies and related costs, salaries and benefits, consulting and outside services costs, depreciation and amortization costs and insurance, travel and overhead costs. Cost of product sales decreased approximately 80% and 78% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. Cost of product sales decreased during 2020 due to the suspension of production, resulting from the fire.

Research and development cost included expenditures related to the improvement of the AquaRefining technology. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, research and development costs decreased 26% and 46%, respectively, over the comparable periods in 2019. The decline in research and development cost is primarily the result of management's focus on transitioning to a capital light business strategy.

General and administrative expense decreased approximately 68% and 53% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. The suspension of activities under our Operations, Maintenance and Management Agreement with Veolia, reduced Company payroll and improvements in nearly all other expense categories drove the decrease. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we had $5.8 million of non-cash expense related to the Veolia agreement. We also incurred costs of approximately $0.2 million for professional serves fees associated with the sublease of the Alameda facility.

The following table summarizes our other income and interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 together with the percentage change in those items (in thousands).

Insurance proceeds net of related expenses resulted from collection and payment activity that began in 2020 as a result of the November 2019 fire. Interest expense in 2019 was related primarily to the $5.0 million Interstate Battery convertible note (until January of 2019) and the $10.0 million note payable to Veritex, the successor in interest to Green Bank, amortization of debt issuance costs incurred in connection with both of these notes, as well as an accrual for the USDA guarantee fee on the $10.0 million note to Veritex. On January 24, 2019, we repaid Interstate Battery the outstanding principal and interest on the convertible debt in the amount of $6.7 million. As a result of this debt repayment, we amortized the remaining discount on the note of $2.6 million and remaining deferred financing expenses of $20,000 to interest expense. Interest expense decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019 as a result of the Interstate Battery note repayment, the principle debt reduction through scheduled payments on the Veritex loan, along with decreases in the variable interest rate for that note. Interest income decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, primarily due to lower cash balances during the period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2020, we had total assets of $55.9 million and working capital of $2.4 million.

The following table summarizes our cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities (in thousands):

Net cash used in operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 was $9.0 million and $18.6 million, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities during each of these periods consisted primarily of our net loss adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation charges, and impairment charge as well as net changes in working capital.

Net cash provided by and used in investing activities

Net cash provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $7.0 million and consisted mainly of $9.8 million of insurance proceeds offset by $2.8 million related to purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $9.3 million and consisted primarily of purchases of fixed assets related to the build-out of our TRIC recycling facility in Nevada. In March of 2019, we disposed of the capital shares of our UK subsidiary, Ebonex IPR, Ltd. The sale price was a nominal cash amount and did not contribute to net cash used in investing activities.

Net cash provided by financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 consisted of Payroll Protection Program loan proceeds of $0.3 million, partially offset by payments on debt of $0.2 million. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 consisted of $9.1 million net proceeds from our January 2019 public offering and $20.3 million net proceeds from our May 2019 public offering. This was offset by a $6.7 million payoff of the Interstate Battery convertible note.

As of September 30, 2020, we had total cash of $5.6 million and working capital of  $2.4 million. As of the date of this report, we believe that we will require additional capital in order to fund our current level of ongoing costs and our proposed business plan over the next 12 months as we move forward with our capital light licensing strategy. We intend to acquire the necessary capital though the recovery of insurance proceeds on our fire related claims, the possible sale of certain equipment and assets at TRIC and the sale of equity or debt securities. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect insurance proceeds or acquire proceeds from the sale of TRIC in amounts sufficient to fund the capital requirements or, if we are successful, that we will not require additional capital. Funding that includes the sale of our equity may be dilutive. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to further pursue our business plan and we may be unable to continue operations. Additionally, we were not in compliance with the minimum debt service coverage ratio covenant on our loan from Veritex as of the fiscal quarter ends between March 31, 2017 and September 30, 2020. We received a waiver for the minimum debt service coverage ratio covenant for those periods. While we expect to continue to receive waivers from Veritex for non-compliance with such covenant, there is no guarantee that we will receive such waivers. If Veritex determines not to grant us a waiver for non-compliance in the future, we would be in default of the loan and Veritex would be able to accelerate the payment of all amounts under the loan.

On March 25, 2020, we entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) with Veritex regarding our loan from Veritex.

Pursuant to the MOA, we have agreed to the allocation of proceeds from insurance policies and sales of collateral secured by the loan. We have agreed on the allocation of all insurance proceeds, with the proceeds allocated to Veritex to be used to pay off all amounts outstanding under the loan, approximately $8.5 million as of the date of this report (inclusive of an approximate $500,000 prepayment penalty, netted against a $1,000,000 CD collateral). As of September 30, 2020 we have set aside and escrow account of approximately $7.6 million of insurance proceeds allocated to Veritex to pay off the outstanding balance of the loan.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We do not enter into financial instruments for trading or speculative purpose. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest expense related to our debt with Veritex Bank. The interest rate on this loan adjusts on the first day of each calendar quarter equal to the greater of six percent (6%) or two percent (2%) per annum above the minimum prime lending rate charged by large U.S. money center commercial banks as published by the Wall Street Journal.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that evaluation, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2020.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the nine month period ended September 30, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Beginning on December 15, 2017, three purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United Stated District Court for the Northern District California against us, Stephen Clarke, Thomas Murphy and Mark Weinswig. On March 23, 2018, the cases were consolidated under the caption In Re: Aqua Metals, Inc. Securities Litigation Case No 3:17-cv-07142. On May 23, 2018, the Court appointed lead plaintiffs and approved counsel for the lead plaintiffs. On July 20, 2018, the lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint (“Amended Complaint”), on behalf of a class of persons who purchased our securities between May 19, 2016 and November 9, 2017, against us, Stephen Clarke, Thomas Murphy and Selwyn Mould. The Amended Complaint alleges the defendants made false and misleading statements concerning our lead recycling operations in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder and seeks to hold the individual defendants as control persons pursuant to Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The Amended Complaint also alleges a violation of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) based on alleged false and misleading statements concerning our lead recycling operations contained in, or incorporated by reference in, our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed in connection with our November 2016 public offering. That claim is asserted on behalf of a class of persons who purchased shares pursuant to, or that are traceable to, that Registration Statement. The Amended Complaint seeks to hold the individual defendants liable as control persons pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities Act. The Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs. On September 18, 2018, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint in its entirety and the plaintiff subsequently filed its opposition to the motion. In an Order dated August 14, 2019, the Court granted in part, and denied in part, the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court granted the motion to dismiss the Securities Act Section 11 claim and the Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claim based on alleged false and misleading statements and gave the plaintiffs leave to amend to address the deficiencies. The Court denied the motion to dismiss the Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims regarding site visits. On September 20, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint that dropped the Securities Act Section 11 claim but otherwise alleges the same claims as were alleged previously. The Second Amended Complaint seeks unspecified damages and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs. On November 1, 2019, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims in the Second Amended Complaint based on alleged false and misleading statements, but not the claims regarding site visits. The motion is under consideration by the Court. We deny that the claims in the Second Amended Complaint have any merit and we intend to vigorously defend the action.

Beginning on February 2, 2018, five purported shareholder derivative actions were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against us and certain of our current and former executive officers and directors, Stephen R. Clarke, Selwyn Mould, Thomas Murphy, Mark Weinswig, Vincent DiVito, Mark Slade and Mark Stevenson. On May 3, 2018, the cases were consolidated under the caption In re Aqua Metals, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Case No. 1:18-cv-00201-LPS (D. Del.). The complaints were filed by persons claiming to be stockholders of Aqua Metals and generally allege that certain of our officers and directors breached their fiduciary duties to us by violating the federal securities laws and exposing us to possible financial liability. The complaints seek unspecified damages and plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and costs. The parties have entered into a stipulation staying the action until 30 days after a decision on our motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint in the class action described above. The individual defendants deny that the claims in the shareholder derivative action have any merit and intend to vigorously defend the action.

We are not party to any other legal proceedings. We may, from time to time, be party to litigation and subject to claims incident to the ordinary course of business. As our growth continues, we may become party to an increasing number of litigation matters and claims. The outcome of litigation and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, and the resolution of any future matters could materially affect our future financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before purchasing our common stock, you should read and consider carefully the following risk factors as well as all other information contained in this report, including our consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Each of these risk factors, either alone or taken together, could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently believe are immaterial, which could also impair our business and financial position. If any of the events described below were to occur, our financial condition, our ability to access capital resources, our results of operations and/or our future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected and the market price of our common stock could decline. As a result, you could lose some or all of any investment you may make in our common stock.

Risks Relating to the Recent Fire at TRIC

We have experienced a fire at our TRIC facility which has caused significant damage and resulted in the suspension of all revenue producing operations. On the evening of November 29, 2019, a fire occurred at our LAB recycling facility at TRIC. The cause of ignition is likely related to on-site contractor work that was being performed on the day of the fire. The fire was substantially contained to the AquaRefining area of the plant, however the fire destroyed or impaired beyond recovery substantially all of the AquaRefining equipment, including all 16 AquaRefining modules, control wiring and other supporting infrastructure. While we continue to assess the economic loss due to the fire, as of the date of this report we estimate the value of the equipment and plant lost or damaged due to the fire to be up to $30 million excluding any business interruption cost recovery. We maintain insurance policies covering a total of up to $50 million of combined property, equipment and business interruption insurance. As of the date of this report, the insurance carriers have paid a total of $22.6 million on the covered claims and we expect the carriers to make additional payments over the coming months up to the presently estimated value of the equipment and plant lost or damaged due to the fire. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect additional insurance proceeds to cover the loss. In the meantime, we have suspended all revenue producing operations pending our clean-up of the fire damage and development of our plan for the overall business. As of the date of this report, we are unable to estimate when we expect to resume any meaningful commercial or revenue producing operations. As of the date of this report, we intend to fund our resumption of commercial operations, in part, through our receipt of insurance proceeds, however there can be no assurance that we will receive additional insurance payments or, if we do, that any such payments will materially contribute to our ongoing costs of operations.

While we have $50 million of combined property, equipment and business interruption insurance, there can be no assurance that one or more carriers will not attempt to deny coverage. To date, we have submitted claims to each of our insurance carriers. Each of the insurance carriers has accepted coverage under the polices subject to the customary reservation of rights, but no carrier has to our knowledge indicated that it would deny or attempt to deny coverage. Each of our insurance policies contains customary exclusions from the carrier's obligation to cover claims made under the policies, including exclusions based on certain of our intentional acts or omissions, including our willful failure to maintain an adequate fire suppression system. We had acquired and installed a comprehensive fire suppression at TRIC, however the preliminary investigation by the local fire marshal indicates that the fire suppression system at TRIC failed to activate at the time of the fire. We had, at all times leading up to the fire, engaged a nationally recognized fire detection and prevention service company to service and maintain our fire suppression system. The service provider had serviced our fire suppression system as recent as November 12, 2019. As of the date of this report, we have not determined the reason for the failure of our fire suppression system to activate at the time of the fire. However, we have no reason to believe that the failure to activate is due to any action or failure to act on our part that would justify a carrier to exclude payment on our insurance claim. However, there can be no assurance that a carrier may not deny coverage based on its claim that we failed to maintain a fire suppression system as required by the policy or for some other exclusion under the policy. In the event that one or more carriers deny coverage under their policies, we may be unable to finance our recovery and resume commercial operations, in which case you could lose your investment.

Our ability to utilize insurance payments is subject to a memorandum of agreement with our secured lender. As of the date of this report, we are indebted to Veritex Community Bank, or Veritex, the successor in interest to Green Bank, N.A., for approximately $9.1 million ($8.5 million net of issuance costs), which is secured by liens on substantially all of our assets, including the proceeds of any payments made on our insurance claims. Pursuant to the credit agreement governing such indebtedness, Veritex is the loss payee on our insured claims and all funds are paid directly to Veritex, which in turn disburses the proceeds to us subject to their approval. In March 2020, we entered into a memorandum of agreement with Veritex pursuant to which the parties agreed on the allocation of funds from collected insurance payments. Pursuant to the memorandum of agreement, 90% of the initial $5 million and 55% of the next $7.5 million of insurance proceeds will be allocated to us and the balance will be allocated towards the retirement of the Veritex loan. Thereafter, 60% of the next $12.5 million of insurance proceeds has been and will be allocated to us, and the balance towards the repayment of the Veritex loan, until such time as the Veritex loan has been paid in full, after which 100% of all future insurance payouts will be disbursed directly to us. Except as set forth in the memorandum of agreement, all terms and conditions of the credit agreement remain in place and unchanged, including, without limitation, our obligation to make monthly payments under the credit agreement and the effectiveness and enforceability of Veritex’s liens and security interests under the credit agreement. To date, Veritex has disbursed to us funds based on the terms of the memorandum of agreement, however there can be no assurance that Veritex will continue to disburse insurance proceeds in accordance with the memorandum of agreement or that Veritex will not attempt to direct all insurance proceeds to the repayment to Veritex loan in full.

As a result of the fire, we are revising our plans for the commercialization of our AquaRefining technologies and there can be no assurance that such plans will be successful. When we designed and developed TRIC, we did so at a time when our business model assumed that TRIC would be the first of many LAB recycling facilities owned and operated by us. Commencing in 2017, we began to shift our focus away from the development of additional Company-owned LAB recycling facilities and towards the licensing of our AquaRefining technology to partners engaged in LAB recycling. We continued to develop TRIC as a LAB recycling facility for purposes of demonstrating AquaRefining on a commercial scale. However, as a result of the fire and our high costs of capital, we believe that the cost of restoring TRIC to its pre-fire state would not be the best use of our available cash and that we may be able to achieve the benefits of operating our facility at TRIC in its pre-fire state, namely the development and demonstration of the licensing ready iteration of our AquaRefining technologies, which we call Version 1.25L, through a less costly commercialization program. As of the date of this report, we plan to focus on licensing opportunities within the $20+ billion lead battery recycling marketplace. We believe this path is far less capital intensive than a rebuild of TRIC to its pre-fire state and we believe this plan could be funded solely or primarily from cash on hand plus ongoing insurance proceeds and asset disposition of the AquaRefinery. However, there can be no assurance that our revised business model will be successful or that we will acquire insurance proceeds sufficient to fund our revised business plan.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Since we have a limited operating history and have only recently commenced revenue producing operations, it is difficult for potential investors to evaluate our business. We formed our corporation in June 2014 and only commenced revenue producing operations in the first quarter of 2017. From inception through September 30, 2020, we generated a total of $11.5 million of revenue, all of which was derived primarily from the sale of lead compounds and plastics and, to a lesser extent, the sale of lead bullion and Aqua Refined lead. To date, our operations have primarily consisted of the development and testing and limited operations of our AquaRefining process, the construction of our initial LAB recycling facility at TRIC, the continuing development of our LAB recycling operations at TRIC and limited revenue producing operations as we brought those LAB recycling operations online. As a result of the November 2019 fire at TRIC, we have suspended all plant-based revenue producing operations pending our clean-up of the fire damage and development of our plan for resuming operations. In June 2020, we began operating the first iteration of Version 1.25L electrolyzers and plan to roll out additional iterations of improvements throughout 2020 leading up to what we believe will be the licensing ready iteration of 1.25L. Our limited operating history of the AquaRefinery, coupled with our development of the Version 1.25L electrolyzers ahead of us, makes it difficult for potential investors to evaluate our technology or prospective operations. As an early stage company, we are subject to all the risks inherent in the initial organization, financing, expenditures, complications and delays in a new business, including, without limitation:

Investors should evaluate an investment in us in light of the uncertainties encountered by developing companies in a competitive environment. There can be no assurance that our efforts will be successful or that we will ultimately be able to attain profitability.

Our business is dependent upon our successful implementation of novel technologies and processes and there can be no assurance that we will be able to implement such technologies and processes in a manner that supports the successful commercial roll-out of our business model. While much of the technology and processes involved in our lead recycling operations are widely used and proven, the AquaRefining component of our lead recycling operations is largely novel with limited modest scale operations. While we have shown that our proprietary technology can produce AquaRefined lead on a small commercial scale, we had just begun in 2019 to demonstrate that we can produce AquaRefined lead on a large commercial scale. Further, as we endeavored to complete our AquaRefining production line, we continuously encountered unforeseen complications that delayed the ramping up of our AquaRefining modules and the integration of our AquaRefining process with the traditional lead recycling operations. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar unforeseen complications as we pursue our revised business model.

We will need additional financing to execute our business plan and fund operations, which additional financing may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. As of September 30, 2020, we had total cash of $5.6 million and working capital of $2.4 million. As of the date of this report, we believe that we will require additional capital in order to fund our current level of ongoing costs and our proposed business plan over the next 12 months as we move forward with our capital light licensing strategy. We intend to acquire the necessary capital though the recovery of insurance proceeds on our fire related claims and the possible sale of certain equipment and assets at TRIC. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to collect insurance proceeds or acquire proceeds from the sale of TRIC in amounts sufficient to fund the capital requirements or, if we are successful, that we will not require additional capital. If needed, we may seek funding through the sale of equity or debt financing. Funding that includes the sale of our equity may be dilutive. If such funding is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to further pursue our business plan and we may be unable to continue operations, in which case you may lose your entire investment.

We have elected not to renew our current agreement with Veolia and it is unlikely that we will continue to partner with Veolia. In February 2019, we entered into an Operations, Management and Maintenance Agreement with Veolia North America Regeneration Services, LLC, or Veolia. Pursuant to the Agreement, Veolia agreed to provide development of operations programs, start-up of new equipment and operations, maintenance and management services at our AquaRefining facility at TRIC. As a result of the November 2019 fire at TRIC, we have suspended all operations at TRIC pending our clean-up of the fire damage and development of our plan for resuming operations. In January 2020, we declared a force majeure under the Veolia Operations, Management and Maintenance Agreement and suspended payments to Veolia thereunder. The Veolia Operations, Management and Maintenance Agreement included an initial term expiring March 6, 2021 and an automatic renewal provision unless either party elects not to renew. We have elected not to renew the Veolia Operations, Management and Maintenance Agreement and it is presently scheduled to terminate on March 6, 2021. We continue to speak to Veolia concerning various issues, including the possibility of our partnering with Veolia under a new arrangement, however as of the date of this report there can be no assurance, and it appears unlikely, that we will be able to negotiate and conclude a new arrangement with Veolia on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. 

We are subject to restrictive debt covenants that may limit our ability to run our business, finance our capital needs and pursue business opportunities and activities. As of the date of this report, we are indebted to Veritex for approximately $9.1 million ($8.5 million net of issuance costs), which is secured by liens on substantially all of our assets including insurance proceeds. The credit agreement governing such indebtedness contains covenants that limit our ability to take certain actions. These covenants could limit our ability to finance our future operations and capital needs and our ability to pursue business opportunities and activities that may be in our interest. If we breach any of these covenants, the debt holder could declare a default under the credit agreement, in which case all of the indebtedness may then become immediately due and payable. If the debt under the credit agreement is accelerated, we may not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, since all of the indebtedness to Veritex is secured by substantially all of our assets, a default under the credit facility could enable the debt holder to foreclose on its security interest and attempt to seize our assets. The affirmative and negative debt covenants could materially adversely impact our ability to operate and finance our business. In addition, our default under any of these covenants could subject us to accelerated debt payments or foreclosure proceedings that could threaten our ability to continue as a going concern.

Additionally, we were not in compliance with the minimum debt service coverage ratio covenant on our loan from Veritex as of the fiscal quarter ends between March 31, 2017, and September 30, 2020. We received a waiver for the minimum debt service coverage ratio covenant for those periods. While we expect to continue to receive waivers from Veritex for non-compliance with such covenant, there is no guarantee that we will receive such waivers. If Veritex determines not to grant us a waiver for non-compliance in the future, we would be in default of the loan and Veritex would be able to accelerate the payment of all amounts under the loan.

In the event of the acceleration of the Veritex loan, we will need additional financing to satisfy our obligations under the loan, which additional financing may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. As noted above, as of the date of this report, we are indebted to Veritex for approximately $9.1 million ($8.5 million net of issuance costs). The credit agreement governing such indebtedness contain various affirmative and negative covenants and if we breach any of these covenants, the debt holder could declare a default under the credit agreement, in which case all of the indebtedness may then become immediately due and payable. If the debt under the credit agreement is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds to make the accelerated payments, in which case we would be required to seek additional funds through various financing sources, most likely through the sale of our equity or debt securities. However, there can be no assurance that such funds will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Further, any sale of our equity or equity-linked securities will result in additional dilution to our stockholders.

Our outstanding debt may make it difficult for us obtain additional financing using our future operating cash flow. We currently owe approximately $9.1 million to Veritex as of the date of this report. Such indebtedness could limit our ability to borrow additional funds to fund operations or expansion or increase the cost of any such borrowing, or both. Our inability to conduct additional debt financing could:

Any of these or other consequences or events could have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance our business and our operations.

Our business model is new and has not been proven by us or anyone else. We are engaged in the business of producing recycled lead through a novel, and proven on a modest scale, technology. While the production of recycled lead is an established business, to date all recycled lead has been produced by way of traditional smelting processes. To our knowledge, no one has successfully produced recycled lead in commercial quantities other than by way of smelting. In addition, neither we nor anyone else has ever successfully built a production line that commercially recycles LABs without smelting. Further, there can be no assurance that either we or our licensees will be able to produce AquaRefined lead in commercial quantities at a cost of production that will provide us and our proposed licensees with an adequate profit margin. The uniqueness of our AquaRefining process presents potential risks associated with the development of a business model that is untried and unproven.

Certain industry participants may have the ability to restrict our and our future licensees' access to used LABs and otherwise focus significant competitive pressure on us. We believe that our primary competition will come from operators of existing smelters and other parties invested in the existing supply chain for smelting, both of which may resist the change presented by our AquaRefining process. Competition from such incumbents may come in the form of restricted access to used LABs. We believe that LAB manufacturers who also maintain their own smelting operations control a significant part of the market for used LABs. If LAB manufacturers and others involved in the reverse supply chain for used LABs attempt to restrict our and our future licensees' access to used LABs, that may adversely affect our prospects and future growth. There can be no assurance that we will be able to effectively withstand the pressures applied by our competition.

Even if we and our future licensees are successful in recycling lead using our processes, there can be no assurance that the AquaRefined lead will meet the certification and purity requirements of our potential customers. A key component of our business plan is the production of recycled lead through our AquaRefining process of the highest purity (at least 99.99% pure lead), which we refer to as AquaRefined lead. We believe that our AquaRefined lead will provide us and our future licensees with a revenue premium over the market price of lead on the London Metal Exchange, or LME, and, more importantly, the ability to produce AquaRefined lead will be vital to confirming the efficacy and relevancy of our proprietary technology. Lead purchasers will require that our AquaRefined lead meet certain minimum purity standards and, in all likelihood, require independent assays to confirm the lead’s purity. As of the date of this report, we have produced limited quantities of AquaRefined lead and in November 2018, Clarios confirmed its approval of the purity of our AquaRefined lead by providing to us official vendor approval to receive finished lead at its manufacturing facilities. However, we have not produced AquaRefined lead in significant commercial quantities and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so or, if we are able to produce AquaRefined lead in significant commercial quantities, that such lead will continue to meet the required purity standards of our customers.

While we have been successful in producing AquaRefined lead in small volumes, there can be no assurance that either we or our future licensees will be able to replicate the process, along with all of the expected economic advantages, on a large commercial scale either for us or our prospective licensees. Our commercial operations have primarily involved the production of lead compounds and plastics from recycled LABs, and more recently, the sale of lead bullion and AquaRefined lead. In April 2018, we commenced the limited production of cast lead bullion (mixture of lead purchased to prime the kettles and AquaRefined lead from our AquaRefining process), and in June 2018, we commenced the sale of pure AquaRefined lead in the form of two tonne blocks. While we believe that our results of operations to date can demonstrate to potential licensees the value proposition of our AquaRefining technologies, there can be no assurance that potential licensees will recognize the economic and other benefits of our AquaRefining technologies or that our future licensees will be able to produce AquaRefined lead in commercial quantities at a cost of production that will provide us and our proposed licensees with an adequate profit margin.

Our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to protect our business. As of the date of this report, we have secured granted/allowed patents in the following countries/regions: U.S. (9837689, 10340561, 10316420, 10665907, 10689769, allowed 20180355494), Canada (2930945), China (201480071929.1, 201680041675.8, 201580062811.7, 201680041600, 201680041571.7), Europe (3072180, allowed 3221918), Eurasia (32371, 035532, allowed 201791004), South Africa (2016/04083, 2017/08454, 2017/04123, 2017/08455, 2018/04384), South Korea (101739414, 101882932, 101926033, 102096976), Honduras (6074), India (318321), Indonesia (IDP000061176, IDP000066550), Japan (6173595, 6592088, allowed 2018517065), Mexico (357027), OAPI (17808, 18736, 19078), ARIPO (4995), Ukraine (118037, 119580), Vietnam (22588) and Australia (2014353227, 2015350562, 2017213449, allowed 2016260407).

We also have further patent applications pending in the United States and numerous corresponding patent applications pending in 17 additional jurisdictions relating to certain elements of the technology underlying our AquaRefining process and related apparatus and chemical formulations. However, no assurances can be given that any patent issued, or any patents issued on our current and any future patent applications, will be sufficiently broad to adequately protect our technology. In addition, we cannot assure you that any patents issued now or in the future will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented.

Even patents issued to us may not stop a competitor from illegally using our patented processes and materials. In such event, we would incur substantial costs and expenses, including lost time of management in addressing and litigating, if necessary, such matters. Additionally, we rely upon a combination of trade secret laws and nondisclosure agreements with third parties and employees having access to confidential information or receiving unpatented proprietary know-how, trade secrets and technology to protect our proprietary rights and technology. These laws and agreements provide only limited protection. We can give no assurance that these measures will adequately protect us from misappropriation of proprietary information.

Our processes may infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, which could lead to costly disputes or disruptions. The applied science industry is characterized by frequent allegations of intellectual property infringement. Though we do not expect to be subject to any of these allegations, any allegation of infringement could be time consuming and expensive to defend or resolve, result in substantial diversion of management resources, cause suspension of operations or force us to enter into royalty, license, or other agreements rather than dispute the merits of such allegation. If patent holders or other holders of intellectual property initiate legal proceedings, we may be forced into protracted and costly litigation. We may not be successful in defending such litigation and may not be able to procure any required royalty or license agreements on acceptable terms or at all.

Our business strategy includes licensing arrangements and entering into joint ventures and strategic alliances, however as of the date of this report we have no such agreements in place and there can be no assurance we will be able to do so. Failure to successfully integrate such licensing arrangements, joint ventures, or strategic alliances into our operations could adversely affect our business. We propose to commercially exploit our AquaRefining process primarily by licensing our technology to third parties and entering into joint ventures and strategic relationships with parties involved in the manufacture and recycling of LABs, including Clarios, among others. Although we are currently seeking to negotiate such an agreement with Clarios as further discussed in the following paragraph, as of the date of this report, we have not entered into any such licensing, joint venture or strategic alliance agreements, apart from our equipment supply agreement with Clarios, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so on terms that benefit us, if at all. In addition, licensing programs, joint ventures and strategic alliances may involve significant other risks and uncertainties, insufficient revenue generation to offset liabilities assumed and expenses associated with the transaction, potential additional challenges in protecting our intellectual property, and unidentified issues not discovered in our due diligence process, such as product quality, technology issues and legal contingencies. In addition, we may be unable to effectively integrate any such programs and ventures into our operations. Our operating results could be adversely affected by any problems arising during or from any licenses, joint ventures or strategic alliances.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate our key agreement with Clarios on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. In February 2017, we entered into a series of agreements with Clarios, including an equipment supply agreement pursuant to which, among other things, we agreed to work with Clarios on the development of a program for the conversion of Clarios and certain strategic partners of Clarios’ existing lead smelters throughout North and South America, China and Europe to a lead recycling process utilizing our AquaRefining technology and equipment, know-how and services. The equipment supply agreement discusses the development of the conversion program in general terms and contemplates that the parties will enter into a definitive development program agreement that is based on the general terms set forth in the equipment supply agreement and provides more detailed terms and conditions, including the economic obligations and rights of each party. We have agreed not to license our AquaRefining technology and equipment to third parties in the aforementioned regions until such time as we and Clarios have agreed on certain matters relating to the initial conversion of a Clarios facility. In June 2019, we entered into an agreement with Clarios to amend the equipment supply agreement pursuant to which we have agreed to use good faith, commercial best-efforts to conclude the discussion and negotiation of, and enter into, a development program agreement no later than the 90th day following our satisfaction of certain performance criteria agreed upon by Clarios and us, however those performance conditions were based on the operation of 16 AquaRefining modules at TRIC, which is unlikely. We have initiated discussions with Clarios to revise the performance conditions, however as of the date of this report we have been unable to reach an agreement with Clarios on revised performance standards. If we are unable to agree with Clarios on revised performance standards, we may be unable to sell AquaRefining equipment or license our AquaRefining technology to third-parties until the expiration of the Equipment Supply Agreement in June 2021 or the agreement’s earlier termination. There can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate and conclude a definitive development program agreement with Clarios on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

There can be no assurance that Clarios will maintain the same level of interest in and commitment to the proposed joint development of our AquaRefining technologies. Our agreements with Clarios were originally entered into with Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. On May 1, 2019, Johnson Controls International plc announced that it had completed the sale of its battery group assets, formerly held by Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc., to Brookfield Business Partners L.P. The acquired battery group assets now operates under the name Clarios. It is our understanding that the agreements and proposed business projects between us and Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (collectively, the "Aqua Metals Collaboration") are now under the control of Clarios, and that certain members of the former management of Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. are now employed in similar capacities by Clarios. We have also been advised that Clarios and Brookfield Business Partners L.P. have expressed their interest in continuing the Aqua Metals Collaboration initiated by us and Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. Although there can be no assurance that Clarios currently has, and/or will maintain, the same level of interest in our joint collaboration as its predecessor, as Clarios could, for example, no longer have an interest in our technologies or have competing priorities, we currently have no reason to believe that Clarios and Brookfield Business Partners L.P. have lost interest. In addition, the change of control of the battery group may cause disruptions and distractions that adversely affect its ability to further the Aqua Metals Collaboration. For these and other reasons, Johnson Controls’ sale of its battery group assets to Brookfield Business Partners L.P. could possibly have a material adverse effect on the Aqua Metals Collaboration.

Global economic conditions could negatively affect our prospects for growth and operating results. Our prospects for growth and operating results will be directly affected by the general global economic conditions of the industries in which our suppliers, partners and customer groups operate. We believe that the market price of their principal product to be produced by our AquaRefining technologies, recycled lead, is relatively volatile and reacts to general global economic conditions. Lead prices decreased from $2,139 per tonne on May 5, 2015 to a low of $1,554 per tonne on November 23, 2015 because of fluctuations in the market. Lead price per tonne was approximately $1,763 per tonne at the end of September 2020. Our business will be highly dependent on the economic and market conditions in each of the geographic areas in which we operate. These conditions affect our business by reducing the demand for LABs and decreasing the price of lead in times of economic downturn and increasing the price of used LABs in times of increasing demand of LABs and recycled lead. There can be no assurance that global economic conditions will not negatively impact our liquidity, growth prospects and results of operations.

We are subject to the risks of conducting business outside the United States. A part of our strategy involves our pursuit of growth opportunities in certain international market locations. We intend to pursue licensing or joint venture arrangements with local partners who will be primarily responsible for the day-to-day operations. Any expansion outside of the US will require significant management attention and financial resources to successfully develop and operate any such facilities, including the sales, supply and support channels, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful or that our expenditures in this effort will not exceed the amount of any resulting revenues. Our international operations expose us to risks and challenges that we would otherwise not face if we conducted our business only in the United States, such as:

U.S. Government regulation and environmental, health and safety concerns may adversely affect our business. Our operations and the operations of our licensees in the United States will be subject to the federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws applicable to the reclamation of lead acid batteries including the Occupational Safety and Health Act ("OSHA") of 1970 and comparable state statutes. Our facilities and the facilities of our licensees will have to obtain environmental permits or approvals to expand, including those associated with air emissions, water discharges, and waste management and storage. We and our licensees may face opposition from local residents or public interest groups to the installation and operation of our facilities. In addition to permitting requirements, our operations and the operations of our licensees will be subject to environmental health, safety and transportation laws and regulations that govern the management of and exposure to hazardous materials such as the lead and acids involved in battery reclamation. These include hazard communication and other occupational safety requirements for employees, which may mandate industrial hygiene monitoring of employees for potential exposure to lead.

We and our future licensees will also be subject to inspection from time to time by various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety regulatory agencies and, as a result of these inspections, we and our licensees may be cited for certain items of non-compliance. For example, in August 2018, the Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or Nevada OSHA, delivered to us a citation and notification of penalty. The citation listed a number of items related to our compliance with Nevada OSHA’s Lead Standard. We reached a settlement agreement with Nevada OSHA on the amount of penalties associated with the citation. We also agreed to engage a lead compliance expert to audit our facility at TRIC for compliance with all provision of the Lead Standard and to generate a written report with findings of any noncompliance, recommended corrective actions, and a time frame to correct the findings of noncompliance. We agreed with Nevada OSHA to correct all findings of noncompliance within the time frame proposed by the lead compliance expert in their report. The lead compliance expert has been engaged, has visited the facility at TRIC and has completed the written report. We have corrected all findings of noncompliance in a timely manner.

Failure to comply with the requirements of federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws could subject our business and our licensees to significant penalties (civil or criminal) and other sanctions that could adversely affect our business. In addition, in the event we are unable to operate and expand our AquaRefining process and operations as safe and environmentally responsible, we and our licensees may face opposition from local governments, residents or public interest groups to the installation and operation of our facilities.

The development of new AquaRefining technology by us or our partners or licensees, and the dissemination of our AquaRefining process will depend on our ability to acquire necessary permits and approvals, of which there can be no assurance. As noted above, our AquaRefining processes will have to obtain environmental permits or approvals to operate, including those associated with air emissions, water discharges, and waste management and storage. In addition, we expect that any use of AquaRefining operations at our partner's facilities will require additional permitting and approvals. Failure to secure (or significant delays in securing) the necessary permits and approvals could prevent us and our partners and licensees from pursuing additional AquaRefining expansion, and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial results and growth prospects. Further, the loss of any necessary permit or approval could result in the closure of an AquaRefining and the loss of our investment associated with such facility.

Our business involves the handling of hazardous materials and we may become subject to significant fines and other liabilities in the event we mishandle those materials. The nature of our operations involves risks, including the potential for exposure to hazardous materials such as lead, that could result in personal injury and property damage claims from third parties, including employees and neighbors, which claims could result in significant costs or other environmental liability. Our operations also pose a risk of releases of hazardous substances, such as lead or acids, into the environment, which can result in liabilities for the removal or remediation of such hazardous substances from the properties at which they have been released, liabilities which can be imposed regardless of fault, and our business could be held liable for the entire cost of cleanup even if we were only partially responsible. We are also subject to the possibility that we may receive notices of potential liability in connection with materials that were sent to third-party recycling, treatment, and/or disposal facilities under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), and comparable state statutes, which impose liability for investigation and remediation of contamination without regard to fault or the legality of the conduct that contributed to the contamination, and for damages to natural resources. Liability under CERCLA is retroactive, and, under certain circumstances, liability for the entire cost of a cleanup can be imposed on any responsible party. Any such liability could result in judgments or settlements that restrict our operations in a manner that materially adversely effects our operations and could result in fines, penalties or awards that could materially impair our financial condition and even threaten our continued operation as a going concern.

We will be subject to foreign government regulation and environmental, health and safety concerns that may adversely affect our business. As our business expands outside of the United States, our operations will be subject to the environmental, health and safety laws of the countries where we do business, including permitting and compliance requirements that address the similar risks as do the laws in the United States, as well as international legal requirements such as those applicable to the transportation of hazardous materials. Depending on the country or region, these laws could be as stringent as those in the US, or they could be less stringent or not as strictly enforced. In some countries in which we are interested in expanding our business, such as Mexico and China, the relevant environmental regulatory and enforcement frameworks are in flux and subject to change. Compliance with these requirements will cause our business to incur costs, and failure to comply with these requirements could adversely affect our business.

In the event we are unable to present and operate our AquaRefining process and operations as safe and environmentally responsible, we may face opposition from local governments, residents or public interest groups to the installation and operation of our facilities.

Risks Related to Owning Our Common Stock

A securities class action lawsuit and shareholder derivative lawsuit are pending against us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. A putative consolidated class action lawsuit and shareholder derivative lawsuit are pending against us and certain of our current and former directors and officers. These lawsuits may divert financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit our operations. Although we deny the material allegations in the lawsuits and intend to defend ourselves vigorously, defending the lawsuits could result in substantial costs. No assurances can be given that the results of these matters will be favorable to us. An adverse resolution of any of these lawsuits could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, we may be the target of securities-related litigation in the future, both related and unrelated to the existing class action and shareholder derivative lawsuits. Such litigation could divert our management’s attention and resources, result in substantial costs, and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We maintain director and officer insurance that we regard as reasonably adequate to protect us from potential claims; however, we are responsible for meeting certain deductibles under the policies and, in any event, we cannot assure you that the insurance coverage will adequately protect us from claims made. Further, as a result of the pending litigation, the costs of insurance may increase and the availability of coverage may decrease. As a result, we may not be able to maintain our current levels of insurance at a reasonable cost, or at all, which might make it more difficult to attract qualified candidates to serve as executive officers or directors.

Our common stock is thinly traded and our share price has been volatile. Our common stock has traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market, under the symbol “AQMS”, since July 31, 2015. Since that date, our common stock has at times been relatively thinly traded and subject to price volatility. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully maintain a liquid market for our common shares. The stock market in general, and early stage public companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. If we are unable to develop and maintain a liquid market for our common shares, you may not be able to sell your common shares at prices you consider to be fair or at times that are convenient for you, or at all. In addition, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, litigation has often been brought against that company and we may become the target of litigation as a result of price volatility. Litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management's attention and resources from our business. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have received a notice of delisting for failure to satisfy the Nasdaq continued listing rule concerning the composition of our audit committee. On May 19, 2020, Sushil “Sam” Kapoor resigned from our board of directors, or Board. Mr. Kapoor was one of three members of the audit committee of our Board. As a consequence of Mr. Kapoor’s resignation, we became out of compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2), which requires that the board of directors of a Nasdaq listed company have an audit committee made up of at least three independent directors. On May 19, 2020, we advised The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC of Mr. Kapoor’s resignation, its consequences with regard to compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5605(c)(2) and our intention to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) in a timely manner. In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(4), we have an automatic cure period in order to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) until (i) the earlier of our next annual stockholders’ meeting or May 19, 2021; or (ii) if our next annual stockholders’ meeting is held before November 16, 2020, then we must evidence compliance no later than November 16, 2020. We intend to appoint a third independent director to our Board and audit committee, and thereby regain compliance Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2), prior to our next annual meeting of stockholders. However, if we are unable to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) in a timely manner, the Nasdaq will commence suspension and delisting procedures.

We have not paid dividends in the past and have no plans to pay dividends. We plan to reinvest all of our earnings, to the extent we have earnings, in order to pursue our business plan and cover operating costs and to otherwise become and remain competitive. We do not plan to pay any cash dividends with respect to our securities in the foreseeable future. We cannot assure you that we would, at any time, generate sufficient surplus cash that would be available for distribution to the holders of our common stock as a dividend. Therefore, you should not expect to receive cash dividends on our common stock.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market for our common stock. Of the 61,175,561 shares of our common stock outstanding as of the date of this report, approximately 59,696,091 shares are held by “non-affiliates” and are freely tradable without restriction pursuant to Rule 144. In addition, in June 2020, we entered into an ATM Sales Agreement with B. Riley FBR, Inc., as sales agent, under which we may offer and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock, to or through the sales agent. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future issuances or sales of our securities including sales of shares of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Sales Agreement or the availability of our securities for future issuance or sale, will have on the market price of our common stock. Issuances or sales of substantial amounts of our securities, including sales of our common stock pursuant to the ATM Sales Agreement, or the perception that such issuances or sales might occur, could negatively impact the market price of our common stock and the terms upon which we may obtain additional equity financing in the future.

Our charter documents and Delaware law may inhibit a takeover that stockholders consider favorable. Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and applicable provisions of Delaware law may delay or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential change in control or change in our management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares, or transactions that our stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests. The provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:

In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law may limit our ability to engage in any business combination with a person who beneficially owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock unless certain conditions are satisfied. This restriction lasts for a period of three years following the share acquisition. These provisions may have the effect of entrenching our management team and may deprive you of the opportunity to sell your shares to potential acquirers at a premium over prevailing prices. This potential inability to obtain a control premium could reduce the price of our common stock.

Our bylaws designate the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company. Our bylaws provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware shall be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us or any our directors, officers or other employees arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law or our certificate of incorporation or bylaws, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us or any our directors, officers or other employees governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This forum selection provision in our bylaws may limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or any our directors, officers or other employees.

Item 6. Exhibits